- - -









- - -
Investment opportunities

Tips from an insider: Five innovative tech startups

Tips from an insider: Stockholm tech start-ups

5 hot life science firms in Stockholm

Stockholm's top five infrastructure projects

Four Stockholm-based ICT firms to watch

Stockholm pioneers life science research

ICT startups offer investment opportunity

Swedish companies ready for exit

Five med-tech investment opportunities

Six cleantech investment opportunities

- - -
Rankings and surveys

Sweden tops English-language skills ranking

Sweden ranked world's best country to grow old

Swedish passport world's best for travellers

Sweden second best country for mothers

Stockholm climbs in competitiveness rankings

Sweden among best countries to be born

Fortune: 'Stockholm top place for startups'

Sweden tops first global Web Index

Sweden world's second most innovative country

Stockholm world's 6th 'best city'

'Cool Stockholm' most competitive Nordic capital

Sweden has (second) best reputation in the world

Sweden among top in Internet download speed

Sweden scores highest in 'Rule of law index'

Stockholm world's No1 in intellectual capital

Sweden the world's most ICT-competitive country

Sweden great place for moms – but Norway better

Swedes place 4th in English skills ranking

Sweden among top ICT countries

Sweden’s 10 greenest brands

‘Sweden needs to sell itself more’

Sweden overtakes the US in competitiveness

Sweden 10th ‘most admired country globally’

Sweden climbs in 'doing business' ranking

Sweden among world's least corrupt nations

Sweden's mortality rates world's second lowest

Sweden a good place to die – but Britain is best

Children in Sweden have best lives

Sweden the most competitive EU nation

Safe to do business with Swedes

How Sweden became an innovation frontrunner

Nordic countries world's most food-secure

Sweden the world’s best country – politically

Swedish firms among world's top brands

Swedish brands climb in global ranking

Sweden tops government ranking - while US lags 

'Swedish model' outranks 'American dream'  

Sweden among world's least corrupt nations



A global conspiracy against St Julian?

"Julian Assange’s supporters don’t know who to fear most: the Great Satan that is America or ‘feminazi’ Sweden", Nathalie Rothschild writes as the WikiLeaks boss is fighting extradition to Sweden.

Assange case sparks rape 'grey zones' debate
Swedish PM slams Julian Assange's claims

LONDON – Walking solemnly up to a cluster of microphones outside Belmarsh Magistrates’ Court in London on Monday, flanked by glamorous socialites, incessant camera flashes lighting up the grey February morning, Julian Assange paused for effect and then pronounced: ‘A black box has been applied to my life and on the outside of that box has been written “rapist”.’ That box is now being opened, he continued, and ‘I hope that over the next days we will see that the box is in fact empty and has nothing to do with the words that are on the outside of it.’

Addressing an international media scrum before a two-day extradition hearing - he is accused of sexual misconduct in Sweden - the Wikileaks founder and self-styled cyber warrior extraordinaire gave the impression that he was practising for a role as himself in an American blockbuster movie. It was a celebrity-studded media spectacle. The courtroom was filled with tweeting journalists and Assange’s celebrity backers, including Mick’s-ex-wife-turned-human-rights-activist Bianca Jagger, socialite Jemima Khan, and the not-quite-so-glamorous veteran politician Tony Benn.

Assange’s box metaphor may have been clunky, but it does reveal a great deal about his self-image. He sees himself as a solid, transparent truth-bearer, able – with a little help from his famous friends – to weather any storm or attack that may be levelled at him by the powers-that-be. He has a clear conscience and no dirty secrets.

Assange and his legal team have decided to play on a kind of Superman/secular Jesus image, presenting the Wikileaks founder as the victim of a global crusade against a bringer of truth and upholder of justice. Two major forces are conspiring to nail him, they suggest: misandrist Sweden and superpower America.

Assange and his lawyers effectively turned the magistrates’ court into a kind of phantasmagoria, projecting images of Sweden as a banana republic where Assange will be tried for ‘sex by surprise’ by man-hating prosecutors before being taken away by CIA agents, ready to force him into an orange jumpsuit and whisk him off to Guantanamo Bay or even put him on death row.

Before the sex charges, Assange had a very different view of Sweden. He had been promised a column in the tabloid Aftonbladet and planned to seek Swedish citizenship. He praised Sweden for its openness, transparency and high degree of protection for whistleblowers. This, after all, is the country that spawned Pirate Bay and Banhof, the company that hosts Wikileaks’ servers in a nuclear-proof bunker.

Oh, how things have changed. Now, Assange sees Sweden as ‘the Saudi Arabia of feminism’. And his celebrity backers agree, lining up to accuse Sweden of being a global bully. Leftie war reporter John Pilger said Sweden ‘should be ashamed’. Feminist writer Naomi Wolf wrote a letter to Interpol, accusing Sweden of acting as a ‘global dating police’ (apparently with no sense of irony). Bumbling filmmaker Michael Moore wrote a letter to the Swedish government accusing it of ‘cynically and disgustingly using the real and everyday threat that exists against women everywhere to help further the American government’s interest in silencing the work of Wikileaks’.

The fact that Assange hired top barrister Geoffrey Robertson QC to lead his defence at the extradition hearing this week is a further sign that his strategy might be to paint Sweden as a rogue state. For the Australian-British celebrity human rights lawyer is famous for having led the prosecution in hearings against Malawi’s previous leader, Hastings Banda, and for serving as a judge on the United Nations war crimes tribunal in Sierra Leone. Robertson has also expressed wishes to set up a ‘Convention Against Tyranny’. In other words, this is an attorney who is used to putting nations and dictators on trial. Now he warns that Assange would face a secret, closed-door trial in Sweden, suggesting that the authorities there will mistreat an innocent man with impunity.

Granted, the grounds for the two women’s sex accusations look pretty shaky, and Sweden’s rape laws, widely regarded as the strictest in the world, are deeply problematic. Sweden has an image as a sexually liberated society, but the idea of women’s sexual empowerment has become skewed. In Sweden, it is widely regarded as understandable for a woman to feel assaulted or taken advantage of if she hasn’t given active consent every step of the way during a sexual interaction. This outlook appears to infuse the accounts of the two Swedish women who have accused Assange of sexual molestation and unlawful coercion.

Yet the attempt of Assange’s legal team to paint Sweden as a feminist dictatorship that wilfully locks up any man accused of bad sex is fanciful. Back in December 2010, Assange’s London attorney, Mark Stephens, claimed Swedish prosecutors told him that Assange was not wanted for allegations of rape, but for something called ‘sex by surprise’. ‘Whatever “sex by surprise” is, it’s only an offence in Sweden - not in the UK or the US or even Ibiza’, Stephens said. ‘I feel as if I’m in a surreal Swedish movie being threatened by bizarre trolls.’

In fact, there is no obscure law against ‘sex by surprise’ in Sweden. This is a translation of a slang expression, överraskningssex, used to describe someone initiating sex without forewarning. Although some say this slang expression gives rape a positive slant, it’s not something that would hold up in court as a criminal accusation.

There have been more conspiratorial twists and turns in this sordid saga than there are leaked cables on Wikileaks’ servers. All of these theories and the celebrity-studded extradition hearing may make for an exciting Oscar-contending script some time in the future. But for now, let’s get real and start thinking outside Assange’s conspiracy-theory filled box.

Nathalie Rothschild
commissioning editor of spiked.

Spiked is an independent online phenomenon dedicated to raising the horizons of humanity by waging a culture war of words against misanthropy, priggishness, prejudice, luddism, illiberalism and irrationalism in all their ancient and modern forms.


Last Updated (Wednesday, 09 February 2011 13:58)



#8 2011-03-07 05:13
There is one good thing about this sad affair, namely that it makes it clear to even the most obtuse that the rich and powerful and the feminists are allies, and not just in Sweden.
#7 2011-02-13 22:41
Today there are far less physical borders and technical aspects of the Internet determines their contemporary substitutes.

To blame Julian Assange for pointing all this out is folly. I guess I'll finish with a slogan coined after 9-11. "Fight the real enemy."
#6 2011-02-13 22:41
It is not clear that the parties exposed by Assange are beacons of civility or ordered freedom. Neither is it clear that the insitutions delivering civility and order for western societies are effectively striving or succeeding to continue to do so. At the borders of every ordered society stands barbarians ready to ransack cities with their gates open at night.
#5 2011-02-13 22:40
The question everyone should ask themselves is: "How can we handle this to increase the amount of civility and ordered freedom in the western democratic societies."
#4 2011-02-13 22:39
This summary was translated into English and then spread across the Internet and the fact that Naomi and others then made public statements about "surprise sex" as if it was a legal term is if not humour at least mildly entertaining.

Suprise sex in the assange context is thus most interesting as the subject of some study about how memes spreads across the internet and affects (political) discourse, nothing else.
#3 2011-02-13 22:38
It is also a tounge in cheek euphemism for rape proper in some ... umm.. lets call them ... hardboiled... discussions in some [censored]s, eg on the forum flashback, where the first summary about the Assange debacle written by people who where not thinking about their careers when they put it together, was published.

Flashback is an anarchistic forum where a lot of information more established venues choose not to publish are made available to the Swedish public.
#2 2011-02-13 22:38
"Surprise sex" is mostly used as an ironic defense against the deliberatly arbitrary broadening of the term rape in Sweden, as is evident in the Assange case.

One point about "suprise sex" is that some gender activists would like to criminalize sex without explicit consent, effectively criminalizing lots of everyday people in their everyday lives. Not a very good idea...
#1 2011-02-12 18:39
"the Great Satan that is America"? How insulting to Americans. Egypt has clearly shown you that a government does not reflect the quality of its people, and that those people should not be judged by the face of their crummy governments. The people read these stories, think of us when you colour your articles with phrases like that and practice differentiating a people from its government.

Latest Jobs for English speakers in Sweden


Jobs for English speakers in Sweden

Most Read Searched